If there is a topic of conversation that everyone has an opinion on, it's homosexual marriage. In our modern western culture, this topic probably generates more heat than light as the emotions run very high all the way around. Christians and homosexual advocates are particularly vocal and at times very hostile toward each other.
Biblically, there is no doubt as to the stand on homosexual practice - it is a sin. Most notably is the Apostle Paul in Romans 1 where he calls the act 'unnatural' and 'degrading'. This along with many other verses makes the Bible's position clear. Homosexuality is a sin.
One thing though that needs to be cleared up about homosexuality is how big a sin it really is. The way you hear the TV preachers talk it is the most terrible sin ever. The fact is that it is in many ways equal to other sexual sins. In the Law, homosexuality and adultery have the same penalty - death. This indicates that while homosexuality isn't exactly high on God's hit parade, neither is adultery which the Bible equates as equally despicable in God's sight. This sheds a whole new light on the issue to me because many Christians will decry the homosexual and then turn around and slightly shrug their shoulders when it comes to adultery saying: 'well these things happen'. No wonder the charge of hypocrisy sticks.
The rhetoric that is thrown both ways is not helpful. I find the term 'homophobic' not only to be a bogus term, but to be an emotionally laced term as well that has no value; it simply is used against the opponents of homosexuality so they will shut up and then no real debate or discussion takes place on the value of homosexuality. On the flip side, the expression "Hate the sin, but love the homosexual" does not have much effect either. It in fact creates more barriers.
The real issue from a marriage standpoint for me is that any such union will never be more than a contract arrangement, the only question that remains for American society is: will such a contract be culturally accepted? The reason I say this is that the Bible offers no possibility for a same-sex couple to truly achieve spiritual covenant. By design, God has created male and female and only presents that this arrangement has a possibility of achieving such a union. In simplest terms, it is not possible.
My basic contention is that homosexuals cannot actually achieve sexual intercourse, therefore the idea they can be truly 'one flesh' is not possible. The reality is that while a homosexual couple can draw close to each other emotionally, mentally and even spiritually, they can never truly be physically one. In all cases of homosexuality, sexual expression can only be achieved by everything else but actual sexual intercourse.
The other place where a homosexual union fails is that to have a covenant is that God must be in it. The only relationship that can draw close in homosexuality is the between the two humans, Because God declares that a homosexual union is sin, there is no way He could draw close to either party unless they give up their homosexuality. Sorry, No spiritual covenant.
My counsel to homosexuals is the same though as I would to a couple in open marriage. You are settling for a lesser form of marriage than the one form that is presented as the ideal. That ideal, one man / one woman in covenant with each other and God stands as the biblically highest form of marriage.
Even if laws were changed to allow such unions, I simply do not see a Biblical acceptance of the idea of homosexual marriage. Culture may accept it, and Christians will indeed have to accept it if that happens. The fact remains that culture changes and over the centuries Christianity has had to adapt and change to maintain 'love and truth'.
Thanks for the insight, Ed. My kids and I just had a discussion about Gay Marriage. I was surprised that all three felt that while they morally couldn't support homosexuality, they couldn't vote against a constitutional amendment to allow them to marry. I was surprised that they could separate what they believe is wrong from what they see as un-constitutional. We never did come to an agreement on that discussion. Thanks again for the hard topic you covered today.
ReplyDeleteThanks
ReplyDeleteTough topic, but discussion needs to take place for sure.